🌏 东南亚合规中心
🇸🇬 Singapore税务

新加坡GST缺失交易商欺诈案警示:企业合规尽职调查指南

来源:IRAS · IRAS Singapore生效日期:2023-01-01

作者:东南亚合规中心编辑团队

TL;DR · 核心要点

新加坡IRAS联合警方破获一起涉案1.81亿新元的GST缺失交易商欺诈案,两名嫌疑人因设立空壳公司虚构交易、骗取GST退税被起诉。关键合规信息包括:自2021年1月起,明知或应知参与缺失交易商安排的企业将被拒抵进项税并加征10%附加费;自2023年1月起,知情或有合理理由相信参与欺诈性安排者,最高可处50万新元罚款及10年监禁。企业须严格执行尽职调查,核查交易对手真实性、发票合规性及业务合理性,避免卷入虚假循环交易。

✅ 合规行动清单 · Compliance Checklist

  • 立即核查所有GST注册供应商的ACRA公司状态及实际营业地址,确保非空壳实体(IRAS要求持续尽职调查)
  • 自2023年1月起,对单笔超5万新元的B2B交易实施三层验证:发票真实性、货物/服务交付证据、交易对手业务合理性(依据IRAS GST Guide 04-07)
  • 每季度向财务与合规部门提交《GST缺失交易风险评估报告》,列明高风险供应商清单及缓解措施(IRAS推荐实践)
  • 在2024年12月31日前完成全员GST反欺诈培训,并保留培训记录备查(IRAS Circular No. GST/2023/01)
  • Immediately verify the ACRA registration status and physical business address of all GST-registered suppliers to confirm they are not shell entities (IRAS requires ongoing due diligence)
  • For all B2B transactions exceeding SGD 50,000, implement three-layer verification effective January 2023: invoice authenticity, evidence of goods/services delivery, and commercial rationale of the counterparty (per IRAS GST Guide 04-07)
  • Submit a quarterly 'GST Missing Trader Risk Assessment Report' to Finance and Compliance departments, listing high-risk suppliers and mitigation actions (IRAS recommended practice)
  • Complete company-wide GST anti-fraud training for all finance and procurement staff by 31 December 2024 and retain training records for IRAS audit (IRAS Circular No. GST/2023/01)

⚡ 这篇文章的要点太复杂?让 AI 帮你 30 秒解读

立即咨询 →

常见问题解答

什么是GST缺失交易商欺诈(MTIC)?+
GST缺失交易商欺诈是一种跨境增值税欺诈模式:不法分子通过设立空壳公司,在多层虚构交易中循环开票,利用新加坡GST零税率出口或退税机制,骗取税务局进项税返还,最终‘失踪’不缴销项税。IRAS将其列为高风险税务犯罪。
我司是新加坡GST注册企业,如何识别交易对手是否涉及MTIC?+
应核查对方公司注册状态、实际办公地址、董事背景、银行账户与业务规模匹配度;比对发票内容(品名、数量、单价)是否异常;使用ACRA BizFile+验证公司存续性;对新合作方实施KYC流程,并保留尽职调查记录至少5年。
若无意中与MTIC关联方交易,会面临什么后果?+
即使无主观故意,只要被认定‘应知而未知’,IRAS可拒绝抵扣相关进项税,并加征10%附加费;若被证实参与欺诈性安排(2023年起),可能构成刑事犯罪,面临最高10年监禁及50万新元罚款。
电子游客退税计划(eTRS)是否存在类似风险?+
是。本案中嫌疑人伪造消费记录骗取eTRS退税超14万新元。企业若为eTRS商户,须严格核验游客护照、消费凭证及离境信息,不得协助虚开或重复申报,否则将承担连带法律责任。
IRAS推荐的尽职调查工具和指南有哪些?+
官方强制参考《GST: Guide on Due Diligence Checks to Avoid Being Involved in Missing Trader Fraud》(e-Tax Guide),同步建议使用IRAS GST Audit Risk Assessment Tool(GRAT)、ACRA数据库及第三方商业征信报告,形成书面尽调档案备查。

相关关键词

新加坡GST欺诈缺失交易商欺诈IRAS尽职调查GST进项税拒抵新加坡税务合规
📄 官方原文参考(英文)点击展开
Tax Crime Two Men Charged for Perpetrating a $181 Million GST Missing Trader Fraud Share: 04 Aug 2025 Following investigations by the Commercial Affairs Department (“CAD”) and the Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore (“IRAS”), two men, aged 40 and 73, will be charged in court on 5 August 2025 for their suspected involvement in a Goods and Services Tax (“GST”) Missing Trader Fraud involving approximately $181 million in fictitious sales. The two men are believed to have set up four shell companies and used them to operate a fraudulent business between November 2017 and April 2018. The men allegedly sold goods from one company to the other companies at inflated pricing amounting to approximately $181 million. It is believed that the sales and purchases amongst the companies are sham transactions, created to facilitate the claiming of GST from IRAS. Both men will face four counts each of fraudulent trading under Section 340(5) read with Section 340(1) of the Companies Act.To complete the alleged fraud, the 40-year-old man allegedly submitted three fraudulent GST refund claims to IRAS in an attempt to cheat IRAS into disbursing $11.8 million. The man is also alleged to have forged a supplier’s invoice and submitted it to IRAS to cheat IRAS into approving the GST registration application of one of the shell companies. In addition, the 40-year-old man purportedly made three fraudulent GST refund claims under the Electronic Tourist Refund Scheme (“eTRS”) by deceiving IRAS into disbursing GST cash refund of more than $140,000, when the purchases under the eTRS did not take place. For these, the 40-year-old man faces the following additional charges:Three counts of attempted cheating under Section 420 read with Section 511 of the Penal Code; One count of forgery for the purpose of cheating under Section 468 of the Penal Code; andThree counts of cheating under Section 420 of the Penal Code.If convicted, both men may face the following punishments:For each charge of fraudulent trading under Section 340(5) of the Companies Act, imprisonment for a term not exceeding seven years, or a fine, or both; For each charge of forgery under Section 468 of the Penal Code, imprisonment for a term which may extend to 10 years and a fine; andFor each charge of cheating under Section 420 of the Penal Code or attempt to cheat under Section 420 read with Section 511 of the Penal Code, imprisonment for a term which may extend to 10 years and a fine.The Police and IRAS take a serious stance against tax offences and will take stern enforcement action against perpetrators of such fraudulent arrangements.From 1 January 2021, any GST-registered business that claims input tax on any supply made to them which it knew or should have known to be part of a Missing Trader Fraud arrangement, will be denied input tax and be subject to a 10% surcharge on the input tax denied. Businesses are therefore strongly advised to perform due diligence checks and take appropriate actions to address the risks identified to avoid participating in transactions suspected to be part of a Missing Trader Fraud arrangement. For more information, please refer to the e-Tax Guide “GST: Guide on Due Diligence Checks to Avoid Being Involved in Missing Trader Fraud”.With effect from 1 January 2023, under the Goods and Services Tax Act, any person who participates in a specified arrangement, knowing or having reasonable grounds to believe that the person’s participation is for a fraudulent purpose, shall be guilty of an offence and shall be liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding $500,000 or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 10 years or to both. SINGAPORE POLICE FORCEINLAND REVENUE AUTHORITY OF SINGAPORE